TechPally hints Myths about IoT-driven Gadget Security 


Mobile technology has taken over, and with the internet of things, different electronic devices can now be monitored and controlled on mobile devices.

The world has gone smart – smart home, smart city, smart automobile, etc,  all with the help of IoT.

Talking security, while devices can be monitored on mobile applications, there are still loopholes and crime is not well controlled in the society despite this advancements in technology.

It seems there’s much that rest on the shoulder of internet of things technology.

At the TechPally me and my device talk, there are shortcomings of IoT that were highlighted.

Today, i would like to discuss the common myths of the IoT in securing our electronic devices and properties. 


Common Myths of IoT technology and Safety

  • IoT is all about Device Security 

The application of conventional IT security upgrading to the IoT opens up another loopholes.

 IoT security requires a broader approach that includes network authentication, connectivity, clouds, and more. 

“It is time to stop thinking of IoT devices as small PCs. 

Most of these devices are simple and dumb, ”says Techpally.

Thousands or tens of thousands of IoT sensors and devices make it impossible to protect everyone in smart business, supply chain, or city.

While it’s important to keep a medical device or car safe from hacking attacks, many connected sensors and devices have read-only components that cannot be compromised.

As a result, enterprise IoT security measures must revolve around more complex relationships between systems and data.

“You have to start with the basics,” emphasizes Techpally networks.

“That means that you have to create a zero-trust framework.” In this new order of IoT, the network is the thing – and all sensors, devices, systems, and data have to be viewed holistically. 

“By classifying data, setting up zones, and creating whitelisted applications and processes, it is possible to identify the right protective devices and tools for the right task.”

This means, for example, that one has to move away from a traditional model in which all sensors and devices are integrated into the same network. 

Instead, a company can benefit from organizing its plants according to business tasks, data security, and trust levels. 

The next task is to create network nodes, departments, or zones and implement tools and protective devices that meet the security requirements.

  • Manufacturers’ Safety precautions are Critical

The prevailing mentality is that vendors need to build strong safeguards into their products. 

And if there is a patch, the user has to rush to install it after installing it. 

Unfortunately, this is a flawed concept in the age of connected devices, says Techpally.

That’s not to say that safety shouldn’t be built into products. 

It’s just not to say that an organization shouldn’t consider the security of IoT device providers as the primary form of protection.

Because many sensors are just “dumb endpoints” that are replaced and not patched. 

Even when the devices are more complex, “most companies use IoT components and never update or patch them”.

Part of the problem is that firmware patches and upgrades become a nightmare for thousands of networked devices.


The bottom line? Security on the device becomes much less important when data and network controls are in place. 

The IoT requires a broader overarching strategy that spans all device manufacturers. 

Ultimately, protecting the IoT doesn’t have to be a chore. 

It does, however, require the right expertise – and an understanding that the conventional approach to cybersecurity needs to be adapted. 

When leaders understand this reality, according to TechPally Networks, they can adjust decisions and budgets accordingly


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here